PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS
Questão 32 (Português e Inglês) da 2ª fase do IME 2026
Texto-base das questões 31 a 37 · Português e Inglês
Text 2
The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Industry
Looking at the environmental, economical, and political impact of electric vehicles.
By Patrick Peterson of GoodCar
Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period. It wasn’t so long ago that public opinion labeled them as overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage to boot. However, rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology. While misinformation is rampant, people’s faith in EVs has risen enough that over 40 percent of Americans would seriously consider making the switch. Growing interest pressures manufacturers to reorganize their supply chains with a stronger emphasis on EVs. This sounds simple, but there are significant differences in EV development compared to gas-powered cars. The longstanding dominance of gas-powered vehicles makes most people believe it was the only option up until now. But that’s wrong. The idea of electric vehicles has been experimented with since the early 1800s. Robert Anderson is credited for inventing the first electric vehicle. The Scottish inventor used primary cells (single-use batteries) to power a motor he fixed to a carriage. This idea for a “horseless carriage” was a pivotal moment in history that gave future inventors a foundation to work on. Jump to today, and EVs have skyrocketed in popularity. They’ve proven to be a more sustainable option and have a lower overall cost than gas-powered cars. Opponents of adopting EVs argue that battery-powered vehicles aren’t entirely emission-free. And they’re right. Carbon emissions are created during the manufacturing process and when charging the battery. This is because fossil fuels are required to mine the minerals used in batteries and to generate the power used to recharge them. However, these emissions are substantially lower than those released by cars using an internal combustion engine. A study performed by MIT found that electric-powered cars created about 25 percent fewer carbon emissions per mile than a gasoline alternative. This study even assumed the cars were in less eco-friendly states. When Washington was used as the backdrop, the study reported that an EV would create 61 percent fewer emissions. This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower. Norway, Europe’s biggest EV market, takes a similar approach. Over half of Americans are willing to pay more for sustainably responsible products. A comparable number of citizens say the same thing about gasoline. This support for greener brands shows the automotive industry how the future will look. Manufacturers’ supply and production procedures must start adapting now to prepare for the future. There are even various government incentives to make the process easier.
Adapted from: unsustainable in https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/impact-of-electric-vehicles/ [Accessed on 9th July 2025].
Mark the option that shows the most accurate meaning of the highlighted word in the sentence below: “Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period.” (line 1)
- AA dramatic improvement in appearance or status.
- BAn increase in heat or combustion.
- CA gradual decline in popularity.
- DA malfunction in the electric system.
- EA government-funded promotional campaign.
Reportar erro na questão
Resolução comentada
Glow-up é uma gíria em inglês que designa uma transformação muito positiva, uma melhora marcante de aparência, imagem ou condição, geralmente em pouco tempo.
O contexto confirma esse sentido:
- A frase diz que os EVs tiveram um "remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period", ou seja, uma mudança notável em pouco tempo.
- A frase seguinte contrasta o passado e o presente: antes, a opinião pública os via como "overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage" (caros, ineficientes, com pouca autonomia).
- Depois, o texto mostra que a confiança nos EVs cresceu e que mais de 40% dos americanos considerariam trocar de carro.
Portanto, o texto descreve uma melhora forte na imagem, no status e na percepção dos veículos elétricos. Isso corresponde a "uma melhora dramática em aparência ou status".
Não se trata de calor literal (o "glow" não é físico aqui), nem de declínio, defeito técnico ou campanha publicitária, porque nada disso aparece no texto.
Alternativa A.
Pegadinha: A alternativa B engana quem traduz "glow" literalmente (brilho, calor) em vez de reconhecer a gíria e o contexto de mudança de imagem.
Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas
- BToma "glow" ao pé da letra, como brilho ou calor, ignorando o uso figurado da gíria.
- CDeclínio de popularidade é o oposto do que o texto diz, pois a confiança nos EVs aumentou.
- DNada no texto fala de falha no sistema elétrico; a ideia é de melhora, não de defeito.
- EO texto não menciona campanha promocional financiada pelo governo para explicar a mudança de imagem.
Assunto: Vocabulário em contexto e falsos cognatos.
Reportar erro na resolução
Ver como caiu na prova
Fonte: IME 2ª fase 2026 · Português e Inglês. Prova oficial ↗