Correção IME 2027 · MatemáticaAcompanhe a resolução de cada questão da 2ª fase, ao vivoAcompanhar

PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 35 (Português e Inglês) da 2ª fase do IME 2026

Português e Inglês · Inglês: Informações explícitas e detalhes

Texto-base das questões 31 a 37 · Português e Inglês

Text 2

The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Industry

Looking at the environmental, economical, and political impact of electric vehicles.

By Patrick Peterson of GoodCar

Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period. It wasn’t so long ago that public opinion labeled them as overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage to boot. However, rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology. While misinformation is rampant, people’s faith in EVs has risen enough that over 40 percent of Americans would seriously consider making the switch. Growing interest pressures manufacturers to reorganize their supply chains with a stronger emphasis on EVs. This sounds simple, but there are significant differences in EV development compared to gas-powered cars. The longstanding dominance of gas-powered vehicles makes most people believe it was the only option up until now. But that’s wrong. The idea of electric vehicles has been experimented with since the early 1800s. Robert Anderson is credited for inventing the first electric vehicle. The Scottish inventor used primary cells (single-use batteries) to power a motor he fixed to a carriage. This idea for a “horseless carriage” was a pivotal moment in history that gave future inventors a foundation to work on. Jump to today, and EVs have skyrocketed in popularity. They’ve proven to be a more sustainable option and have a lower overall cost than gas-powered cars. Opponents of adopting EVs argue that battery-powered vehicles aren’t entirely emission-free. And they’re right. Carbon emissions are created during the manufacturing process and when charging the battery. This is because fossil fuels are required to mine the minerals used in batteries and to generate the power used to recharge them. However, these emissions are substantially lower than those released by cars using an internal combustion engine. A study performed by MIT found that electric-powered cars created about 25 percent fewer carbon emissions per mile than a gasoline alternative. This study even assumed the cars were in less eco-friendly states. When Washington was used as the backdrop, the study reported that an EV would create 61 percent fewer emissions. This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower. Norway, Europe’s biggest EV market, takes a similar approach. Over half of Americans are willing to pay more for sustainably responsible products. A comparable number of citizens say the same thing about gasoline. This support for greener brands shows the automotive industry how the future will look. Manufacturers’ supply and production procedures must start adapting now to prepare for the future. There are even various government incentives to make the process easier.

Adapted from: unsustainable in https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/impact-of-electric-vehicles/ [Accessed on 9th July 2025].

According to the text, mark the correct option about the role of geography in the environmental impact of EVs:

  1. A
    Geography is irrelevant because EVs are globally standardized.
  2. B
    Environmental impact is minimized in regions with cleaner energy sources.
  3. C
    All regions produce the same emissions regardless of power source.
  4. D
    EVs are only viable in urban environments.
  5. E
    Energy policies in coastal regions are less effective.
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

O trecho decisivo está no penúltimo bloco de argumentos: o estudo do MIT mostrou que carros elétricos geram cerca de 25% menos emissões de carbono por milha que os a gasolina. Quando o cenário foi Washington, a redução subiu para 61%. O texto explica o motivo: "This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower", ou seja, o estado obtém muita energia de usina hidrelétrica, uma fonte mais limpa. Norway é citada como caso semelhante.

As emissões do EV vêm da fabricação e da recarga da bateria, que depende da matriz energética local. Logo, a geografia importa: onde a eletricidade é mais limpa, o impacto ambiental do EV é menor.

Conferindo as opções:

  1. Dizer que a geografia é irrelevante contradiz o contraste entre a média (25%) e Washington (61%).
  2. Dizer que todas as regiões emitem igual ignora a fonte de energia, que o texto destaca.
  3. O texto não restringe os EVs a áreas urbanas.
  4. O texto não fala de eficácia de políticas em regiões costeiras.

Alternativa B.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • AO texto mostra que o local muda o resultado (25% contra 61% em Washington), então a geografia é relevante.
  • CContradiz o texto: as emissões variam conforme a fonte de energia, como a hidrelétrica em Washington.
  • DNada no texto limita os EVs a ambientes urbanos.
  • EO texto não trata de políticas energéticas em regiões costeiras; Washington e a Noruega são exemplos de energia hídrica.

Assunto: Informações explícitas e detalhes.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 35 no caderno Português e Inglês da 2ª fase do IME 2026

Fonte: IME 2ª fase 2026 · Português e Inglês. Prova oficial ↗