PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS
Questão 34 (Português e Inglês) da 2ª fase do IME 2026
Texto-base das questões 31 a 37 · Português e Inglês
Text 2
The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Industry
Looking at the environmental, economical, and political impact of electric vehicles.
By Patrick Peterson of GoodCar
Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period. It wasn’t so long ago that public opinion labeled them as overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage to boot. However, rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology. While misinformation is rampant, people’s faith in EVs has risen enough that over 40 percent of Americans would seriously consider making the switch. Growing interest pressures manufacturers to reorganize their supply chains with a stronger emphasis on EVs. This sounds simple, but there are significant differences in EV development compared to gas-powered cars. The longstanding dominance of gas-powered vehicles makes most people believe it was the only option up until now. But that’s wrong. The idea of electric vehicles has been experimented with since the early 1800s. Robert Anderson is credited for inventing the first electric vehicle. The Scottish inventor used primary cells (single-use batteries) to power a motor he fixed to a carriage. This idea for a “horseless carriage” was a pivotal moment in history that gave future inventors a foundation to work on. Jump to today, and EVs have skyrocketed in popularity. They’ve proven to be a more sustainable option and have a lower overall cost than gas-powered cars. Opponents of adopting EVs argue that battery-powered vehicles aren’t entirely emission-free. And they’re right. Carbon emissions are created during the manufacturing process and when charging the battery. This is because fossil fuels are required to mine the minerals used in batteries and to generate the power used to recharge them. However, these emissions are substantially lower than those released by cars using an internal combustion engine. A study performed by MIT found that electric-powered cars created about 25 percent fewer carbon emissions per mile than a gasoline alternative. This study even assumed the cars were in less eco-friendly states. When Washington was used as the backdrop, the study reported that an EV would create 61 percent fewer emissions. This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower. Norway, Europe’s biggest EV market, takes a similar approach. Over half of Americans are willing to pay more for sustainably responsible products. A comparable number of citizens say the same thing about gasoline. This support for greener brands shows the automotive industry how the future will look. Manufacturers’ supply and production procedures must start adapting now to prepare for the future. There are even various government incentives to make the process easier.
Adapted from: unsustainable in https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/impact-of-electric-vehicles/ [Accessed on 9th July 2025].
According to the text, mark the option that most accurately reflects the relationship between public perception and electric vehicle adoption:
- APublic perception has remained unchanged despite technological advancements in EVs.
- BRising gas prices have had no impact on the perception of electric vehicles.
- CAn improved perception of EVs has directly influenced consumer interest and market demand.
- DAmericans still reject the idea of electric vehicles.
- EThe public's support for EVs stems mainly from government mandates.
Reportar erro na questão
Resolução comentada
O texto abre dizendo que os carros elétricos tiveram uma "remarkable glow-up" (uma melhora notável de imagem) em pouco tempo. Antes, a opinião pública os rotulava como caros, ineficientes e com pouca autonomia.
Depois, o texto explica a mudança: "rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology". Ou seja, a preocupação climática e a instabilidade do preço da gasolina levaram as pessoas a rever o que pensavam sobre os EVs.
O efeito aparece na sequência: a confiança aumentou a ponto de mais de 40% dos americanos considerarem seriamente a troca. Em seguida, "growing interest pressures manufacturers" a reorganizar suas cadeias de produção. Portanto, a ordem é: percepção melhor, mais interesse do consumidor e pressão sobre a oferta, isto é, sobre o mercado.
É isso que a alternativa C diz: a melhora da percepção influenciou o interesse do consumidor e a demanda.
As demais contradizem o texto: a percepção mudou (A); o preço do gás teve papel nessa mudança (B); os americanos não rejeitam os EVs, pois mais de 40% os consideram (D); os incentivos do governo são citados só no fim, para ajudar os fabricantes, e não como origem do apoio do público (E).
Alternativa C.
Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas
- AO texto afirma que a percepção mudou muito, de "overpriced, inefficient" para uma confiança crescente.
- BO texto cita a volatilidade do preço da gasolina como uma das causas da mudança de opinião.
- DMais de 40% dos americanos considerariam seriamente trocar para um EV, o que contradiz a ideia de rejeição.
- EOs incentivos governamentais aparecem só como ajuda aos fabricantes; o apoio do público vem de preocupações climáticas e do preço da gasolina.
Assunto: Informações explícitas e detalhes.
Reportar erro na resolução
Ver como caiu na prova
Fonte: IME 2ª fase 2026 · Português e Inglês. Prova oficial ↗