Correção FUVEST 2027 · 1ª faseAcompanhe a resolução de cada questão da 1ª fase, ao vivoAcompanhar

PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 2 (Inglês) do ITA 2012

Inglês · Inglês: Vocabulário em contexto e falsos cognatos

Texto-base das questões 01 a 03 · Inglês

As questões de 1a 3 referem-se ao texto abaixo.

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2010.

Newsweek Article: Bullying and Empathy (Kate Altman, M.S.)

Desenho de um garoto maior e com expressão zangada levantando o punho fechado em tom de ameaça para um garoto visivelmente menor e assustado

Newsweek offers an article on how schools are using empathy-training programs in an effort to reduce bullying in schools: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/12/15/can-schools-teach-kids-not-to-bully.html

The effective_____ of such programs is unclear at this point, and experts are divided on whether it makes more sense to offer the programs to young children (elementary school age) or older children (middle school age) (both, is probably the answer). High school kids are simply difficult to reach logistically, since they all have different schedules all day. Unsurprisingly, some experts have found that the most important component to empathy training is to include the parents.

In assessing these programs and the broader issues of empathy-training and bullying, there are multiple factors to consider and no clear answers. First of all, empathy is one of the most difficult and least-understood skills we can develop – adults and kids alike. Empathy is the process of viewing and understanding the world through another’s experience, and it is often confused with sympathy, which is, essentially, compassion and lacks the “walking in another’s shoes” component (which is not to say it is not an admirable trait, it’s just different from empathy). Developmentally, children may not be able to truly understand and practice empathy until they are closer to the pre-teen years, but introducing the concept early and often is a good primer for its later development.

Another big question to consider: are programs focused on empathy simply band-aids on much larger, more systemic problems? Why are kids bullying other kids in the first place? What family issues, societal issues, educational issues, are contributing to the need/urge to humiliate and attack other children for some sort of personal gain and satisfaction? My guess is that for many kids, participating in a brief (or even a few brief) empathy-skills seminars simply is not enough, and will not get at the root(s) of the problems(s), no matter how young they are when the programs begin.

I’m not saying that the programs are not a good idea. I imagine that they have a lot of benefits and could especially help kids who would not necessarily be bullies themselves, but may have quietly stood by while witnessing bullying, to become more confident about standing up to/reporting bullies. However, to truly reduce bullying, society and schools need to find ways to identify and work with aggressive children and their families from a young age — to troubleshoot factors (from not having basic needs met, to divorce, to models of aggression in the home, etc.) that contribute to triggering aggressive behavior. Such an approach would be expensive and time- consuming and would command a lot of schools’ resources, but it is hard to imagine a more lightweight approach being nearly as effective.

A opção que descreve a palavra empathy é

  1. A
    essentially compassion.
  2. B
    walking in another’s shoes.
  3. C
    an admirable trait.
  4. D
    a band-aid on more systemic problems.
  5. E
    societal and educational issues.
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

O texto define empathy no segundo parágrafo: "Empathy is the process of viewing and understanding the world through another's experience". Em seguida, o autor a diferencia de sympathy, que seria "essentially, compassion" e não teria o componente "walking in another's shoes".

Ou seja, "andar nos sapatos do outro" (colocar-se no lugar do outro) é exatamente o que caracteriza a empatia e a distingue da simpatia/compaixão.

Conferindo as demais opções:

  1. "Essentially compassion" descreve sympathy, não empathy.
  2. "An admirable trait" é dito sobre a compaixão ("not to say it is not an admirable trait"), e não é o que define a empatia.
  3. "Band-aid on more systemic problems" é a dúvida levantada sobre os programas de empatia, não sobre a palavra.
  4. "Societal and educational issues" são fatores que podem levar ao bullying.

Logo, a descrição que cabe a empathy é a da letra B.

Alternativa B.

Pegadinha: A alternativa A engana porque a palavra "compassion" aparece colada a empathy no texto, mas é a definição de sympathy, apresentada em contraste.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • A"Essentially compassion" é a definição de sympathy, que o texto contrapõe a empathy.
  • C"Admirable trait" refere-se à compaixão (sympathy) no parêntese, não define empathy.
  • DO "band-aid" é a crítica aos programas de treino de empatia, não a própria empatia.
  • EQuestões sociais e educacionais são possíveis causas do bullying, não descrevem empatia.

Assunto: Vocabulário em contexto e falsos cognatos.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 2 no caderno Inglês do ITA 2012

Fonte: ITA 2012 · Inglês. Prova oficial ↗