Correção ENEM 2026Confira suas respostas do 1º dia com o gabarito dos cursinhos e a resolução das questões, até o INEP publicar o oficialVer a correção

PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 15 (Inglês) do ITA 2015

Inglês · Inglês: Referência pronominal e pronomes

Texto-base das questões 11 a 17 · Inglês

As questões de 11 a 17 referem-se ao texto a seguir:

STICKERNOMICS
Football albums
Got, got, got, got, got, need

THE World Cup is still two weeks away, but for children worldwide (plus disturbing numbers of adults) the race to complete the Brazil 2014 sticker book started long ago. Panini, an Italian firm, has produced sticker albums for World Cups since Mexico 1970; this year’s version has 640 stickers to collect. Collecting them is no idle pursuit, however. Getting every slot filled delivers an early lesson in probability, the value of statistical tests and the importance of liquidity.

When you start an album, your first sticker (in Britain, they come in packs of five) has a 640/640 probability of being needed. As the spaces get filled, the odds of opening a pack and finding a sticker you want fall. According to Sylvain Sardy and Yvan Velenik, two mathematicians at the University of Geneva, the number of sticker packs that you would have to buy on average to fill the album by mechanically buying pack after pack would be 899. That assumes there is no supply shock to the market (the theft of hundreds of thousands of stickers in Brazil in April left many fearful that Panini would run short of cards).

It also assumes that the market is not being rigged. Panini says that each sticker is printed in the same volumes and randomly distributed. In a 2010 paper Messrs Sardy and Velenik gamely played the role of “regulator” by checking the distribution of stickers for a 660-sticker album sold in Switzerland for that year’s World Cup. Out of their sample of 6,000 stickers, they expected to see each sticker 9.09 times on average (6,000/660), which was broadly borne out in practice.

Even in a fair market, it is inefficient to buy endless packs as an individual (not to mention bloody expensive for the parents). The answer is to create a market for collectors to swap their unwanted stickers. The playground is one version of this market, where a child who has a card prized by many suddenly understands the power of limited supply. Sticker fairs are another. As with any market, liquidity counts. The more people who can be attracted into the market with their duplicate cards, the better the chances of finding the sticker you want.

Messrs Sardy and Velenik reckon that a group of ten astute sticker-swappers would need a mere 1,435 packs between them to complete all ten albums, if they take advantage of Panini’s practice of selling the final 50 missing stickers to order. Internet forums, where potentially unlimited numbers of people can swap stickers, make this number fall even further. The idea of a totally efficient market should dismay Panini, which will sell fewer packs as a result. But as in all markets, behaviour is not strictly rational. Despite entreaties, your correspondent’s son is prepared to tear out most of his stickers to get hold of Lionel Messi.

Fonte: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21603019-got-got-got-got-got-need-stickernomics
Acesso: 13/ago/2014

Marque a opção em que o item lexical sublinhado não remete a uma informação anterior.

  1. A
    That assumes there is no supply... (linha 10)
  2. B
    ...left many fearful that Panini would run short of cards... (linha 11)
  3. C
    ...sold in Switzerland for that year’s World Cup. (linhas 14 e 15)
  4. D
    ...one version of this market, where a child who has a card prized... (linha 19)
  5. E
    ...should dismay Panini, which will sell fewer packs... (linhas 26 e 27)
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

A questão pede o item que não é anafórico, isto é, que não retoma algo já dito. Vamos checar cada um.

  1. (A) "That assumes there is no supply shock...": o pronome that retoma toda a ideia anterior (o cálculo de 899 pacotes). Retoma informação anterior.

  2. (B) "...left many fearful that Panini would run short of cards": aqui that é conjunção integrante. Ele apenas introduz a oração que diz do que as pessoas tinham medo e não substitui nada já mencionado. Não remete a nada anterior.

  3. (C) "for that year's World Cup": that é um determinante demonstrativo e aponta para o ano já citado, 2010 ("In a 2010 paper..."). Retoma informação anterior.

  4. (D) "one version of this market, where a child...": where é pronome relativo e retoma "this market", o mercado de trocas citado antes. Retoma informação anterior.

  5. (E) "should dismay Panini, which will sell fewer packs": which é pronome relativo e seu antecedente é "Panini". Retoma informação anterior.

Só em (B) o that tem função puramente sintática, de ligar duas orações, sem antecedente.

Alternativa B.

Pegadinha: A alternativa A engana por também ter that, mas ali é pronome demonstrativo que retoma a ideia anterior, enquanto em B é conjunção integrante.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • AO pronome that retoma todo o cálculo anterior (os 899 pacotes), portanto é anafórico.
  • CThat demonstrativo aponta para o ano de 2010, já citado, portanto retoma informação anterior.
  • DWhere é relativo e tem como antecedente "this market", portanto retoma algo já dito.
  • EWhich é relativo e retoma "Panini", portanto remete a informação anterior.

Assunto: Referência pronominal e pronomes.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 15 no caderno Inglês do ITA 2015

Fonte: ITA 2015 · Inglês. Prova oficial ↗