PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS
Questão 18 (Inglês) do ITA 2010
Texto-base das questões 14 a 18 · Inglês
As questões de 14 a 18 referem-se ao texto abaixo:
In August of 2000, a Japanese scientist named Toshiyuki Nakagaki announced that he had trained an amoebalike organism called slime mold to find the shortest route through a maze. Nakagaki had placed the mold in a small maze comprising four possible routes and planted pieces of food at two of the exits. Despite its being an incredibly primitive organism (a close relative of ordinary fungi) with no centralized brain whatsoever, the slime mold managed to plot the most efficient route to the food, stretching its body through the maze so that it connected directly to the two food sources. Without any apparent cognitive resources, the slime mold had “solved” the maze puzzle.
For such a simple organism, the slime mold has an impressive intellectual pedigree. Nakagaki’s announcement was only the latest in a long chain of investigations into the subtleties of slime mold behavior. For scientists trying to understand systems that use relatively simple components to build higher-level intelligence, the slime mold may someday be seen as the equivalent of the finches and tortoises that Darwin observed on the Galapagos Islands.
How did such a lowly organism come to play such an important scientific role? That story begins in the late sixties in New York City, with a scientist named Evelyn Fox Keller. A Harvard Ph.D. in physics, Keller had written her dissertation on molecular biology, and she had spent some time exploring the nascent field of “non-equilibrium thermodynamics”, which in later years would come to be associated with complexity theory. By 1968, she was working as an associate at Sloan-Kettering in Manhattan, thinking about the application of mathematics to biological problems. Mathematics had played such a tremendous role in expanding our understanding of physics, Keller thought – so perhaps it might also be useful for understanding living systems.
In the spring of 1968, Keller met a visiting scholar named Lee Segel, an applied mathematician who shared her interests. It was Segel who first introduced her to the bizarre conduct of the slime mold, and together they began a series of investigations that would help transform not just our understanding of biological development but also the disparate worlds of brain science, software design, and urban studies.
(...)
Johnson, Steven. Emergence. Peguin Books Ltd. 2001, pp. 11-12.
Indique a opção em que a reescrita do trecho “Despite its being an incredibly primitive organism (a close relative of ordinary fungi) with no centralized brain whatsoever, the slime mold managed to plot the most efficient route to the food, …” (parágrafo 1) está correta e mantém o mesmo significado do texto.
- ADue to the fact that the slime mold is an incredibly primitive organism (...) with no centralized brain whatsoever, it managed to plot...
- BIn spite of the fact that the slime mold is an incredibly primitive organism (...) with no centralized brain whatsoever, it managed to plot...
- CBecause it is an incredibly small organism (...) with no central brain whatsoever, the slime mold managed to plot...
- DNot only because of its incredibly primitive organism (...) but also because of having no central brain whatsoever, the slime mold managed to plot...
- EAs the slime mold is an incredibly primitive organism (...) with no central brain whatsoever, it managed to plot...
Você já respondeu questões neste aparelho. Crie sua conta grátis para guardar o histórico e refazer as que errou.
Resposta salva no seu histórico.
Reportar erro na questão
Resolução comentada
O trecho original usa despite ("apesar de"), que expressa concessão: a ideia é que o organismo é primitivo e não tem cérebro centralizado, mas mesmo assim encontrou o caminho mais eficiente. Isso é uma oposição, não uma causa.
O que a questão pede é uma reescrita que mantenha essa ideia de contraste e esteja gramaticalmente correta. Veja as expressões de cada alternativa:
- Due to the fact that, because e as (com sentido de "já que") indicam causa. Isso inverte o sentido do texto e elimina A, C e E.
- Not only... but also indica adição, não contraste, e ainda mistura estruturas ("because of its incredibly primitive organism" não faz sentido). Isso elimina D.
- In spite of the fact that é equivalente a despite the fact that / although. Ela introduz uma oração completa ("the slime mold is..."), com sujeito e verbo, e mantém a concessão.
Assim, "Apesar de o bolor limoso ser um organismo incrivelmente primitivo, sem cérebro centralizado, ele conseguiu traçar a rota" preserva o sentido original.
Alternativa B.
Pegadinha: As alternativas A, C e E enganam quem lê só o conteúdo das orações e não percebe que a conjunção causal troca a concessão de "despite" por causa e efeito.
Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas
- A"Due to the fact that" indica causa e inverte a concessão do original.
- C"Because" dá sentido causal, e ainda troca "primitive" por "small", alterando a informação.
- D"Not only... but also" soma ideias em vez de contrastar, além de ter construção malformada e sentido causal.
- E"As" aqui expressa causa, e troca "centralized" por "central", perdendo o contraste do original.
Assunto: Conectivos e relações lógicas.
Reportar erro na resolução
Ver como caiu na prova
Fonte: ITA 2010 · Inglês. Prova oficial ↗