PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 85 da UFPR 2023 (inglês)

1ª fase

The following text refers to questions 83 to 85. · 1ª fase

Kevin Adkins almost kicked the Ice Age skull to the side because he thought it was just debris from a recent flood – then he saw that it had teeth.

When Kevin Adkins took his father-in-law, Tony Hager, on his first turkey hunt on May 8, 2022, the two West Virginians spotted an animal skull in a Putnam County creek. Covered in mud from a flood that had hit the region two days earlier, it was initially unidentifiable. So Adkins took it home – and later learned that it belonged to an 11,000-year-old giant sloth.

While 36-year-old Adkins had hunted turkeys in Putnam County plenty of times before, he had never come across something like this. Trudging through the muddy wilderness, the Red House resident and his father-in-law were primarily interested in nabbing some wild birds when they encountered the relic.

“We were running and gunning for toms,” Adkins told Outdoor Life. “We’d worked a gobbler for about 30 minutes, then the bird moved off, so we picked up and headed up the creek. I looked down in the middle of the creek as we crossed it and saw a big blob of something I thought was a root ball, so I almost kicked it away.”

“But I noticed something different about it and looked closer,” Adkins went on. “That’s when I saw some molar teeth, so I picked it up.”

Determined not to let the potential find of a lifetime distract from his turkey hunt, Adkins propped the skull next to the creek and forged ahead. When he and Hager concluded their hunt later that morning, they retrieved the skull and carried it home.

“[My wife] thought it was a cow skull because it was so big,” Adkins said. The skull weighed about 30 pounds and sported tufts of hair. It had four molar teeth on either side of its jawbone.

“But my father-in-law said no, it was something very different,” continued Adkins. “That’s when we started searching the internet, sending photos to family and friends, and then I posted it on social media. That really got things moving along with trying to ID what I’d found.”

(Available in: https://allthatsinteresting.com/tag/news.)

According to the text, it is correct to say that:

  1. A
    Adkins and his father-in-law had been hunting turkeys before.
  2. B
    Adkins decided to go turkey hunting during the morning because the region was dry and it was sunny.
  3. C
    Both Adkins and Hager were from West Virginia.
  4. D
    As both men finished hunting, they went home and Adkin’s wife realized the relic was a sloth skull.
  5. E
    After Adkins found the ancient skull, he has been interviewed by different magazines and newspapers.
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

Vamos conferir cada alternativa com o que o texto diz.

  1. O texto afirma: "When Kevin Adkins took his father-in-law, Tony Hager, on his first turkey hunt". Ou seja, era a primeira caçada de peru do sogro. Adkins já tinha caçado em Putnam County "plenty of times", mas o texto não diz que os dois tinham caçado juntos antes. A alternativa A é falsa.

  2. O texto diz que uma enchente atingiu a região dois dias antes, e o crânio estava coberto de lama. Nada fala de dia ensolarado ou de terreno seco, e não há motivo apresentado para a escolha do horário. A B é falsa.

  3. "the two West Virginians spotted an animal skull in a Putnam County creek". West Virginians são os naturais ou moradores da Virgínia Ocidental, e "the two" se refere a Adkins e Hager. Logo, ambos eram de West Virginia. A C é verdadeira.

  4. Foi o sogro que disse que não era crânio de vaca, como pensava a esposa de Adkins. A identificação veio depois, com buscas na internet, fotos enviadas a conhecidos e uma postagem em rede social. A esposa não percebeu que era uma preguiça-gigante. A D é falsa.

  5. O texto cita só uma entrevista, à Outdoor Life. Não há menção a várias revistas e jornais. A E é falsa.

Alternativa C.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • AEra a primeira caçada de peru do sogro, Hager; o texto não diz que os dois já tinham caçado juntos.
  • BO texto menciona uma enchente dois dias antes e nada sobre região seca ou dia ensolarado.
  • DA esposa achou que era crânio de vaca; a identificação veio depois, pela internet e redes sociais.
  • ESó há menção a uma entrevista, à Outdoor Life, não a várias revistas e jornais.

Assuntos: interpretação de texto em inglês, compreensão de detalhes.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 85 no caderno 1ª fase da UFPR 2023

Fonte: UFPR 2023 · 1ª fase. Prova oficial ↗