PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 83 da UFPR 2023 (inglês)

1ª fase

The following text refers to questions 83 to 85. · 1ª fase

Kevin Adkins almost kicked the Ice Age skull to the side because he thought it was just debris from a recent flood – then he saw that it had teeth.

When Kevin Adkins took his father-in-law, Tony Hager, on his first turkey hunt on May 8, 2022, the two West Virginians spotted an animal skull in a Putnam County creek. Covered in mud from a flood that had hit the region two days earlier, it was initially unidentifiable. So Adkins took it home – and later learned that it belonged to an 11,000-year-old giant sloth.

While 36-year-old Adkins had hunted turkeys in Putnam County plenty of times before, he had never come across something like this. Trudging through the muddy wilderness, the Red House resident and his father-in-law were primarily interested in nabbing some wild birds when they encountered the relic.

“We were running and gunning for toms,” Adkins told Outdoor Life. “We’d worked a gobbler for about 30 minutes, then the bird moved off, so we picked up and headed up the creek. I looked down in the middle of the creek as we crossed it and saw a big blob of something I thought was a root ball, so I almost kicked it away.”

“But I noticed something different about it and looked closer,” Adkins went on. “That’s when I saw some molar teeth, so I picked it up.”

Determined not to let the potential find of a lifetime distract from his turkey hunt, Adkins propped the skull next to the creek and forged ahead. When he and Hager concluded their hunt later that morning, they retrieved the skull and carried it home.

“[My wife] thought it was a cow skull because it was so big,” Adkins said. The skull weighed about 30 pounds and sported tufts of hair. It had four molar teeth on either side of its jawbone.

“But my father-in-law said no, it was something very different,” continued Adkins. “That’s when we started searching the internet, sending photos to family and friends, and then I posted it on social media. That really got things moving along with trying to ID what I’d found.”

(Available in: https://allthatsinteresting.com/tag/news.)

According to the text, it is correct to say that the skull both men found as they were hunting turkeys was of:

  1. A
    a predator that used to live in that region thousands of years ago.
  2. B
    a type of animal that moves slowly.
  3. C
    a huge fish that lives in rivers and in the ocean.
  4. D
    a farm animal that is used to produce meat and milk.
  5. E
    a prehistoric shark that used attack people.
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

O texto diz que o crânio, coberto de lama após uma enchente, pertencia a um 11,000-year-old giant sloth, ou seja, uma preguiça-gigante de 11 mil anos atrás. A questão pede o que se pode afirmar a partir disso.

Passo a passo:

  1. Identifique o animal: giant sloth = preguiça-gigante, um mamífero herbívoro da Era do Gelo. Isso já afasta a ideia de predador, de peixe ou de tubarão.
  2. Lembre o que se sabe sobre as preguiças: elas são conhecidas por se mover devagar (em inglês, sloth também significa preguiça, lentidão). A alternativa B diz a type of animal that moves slowly, "um tipo de animal que se move devagar", o que descreve a preguiça.
  3. Verifique as demais: o texto cita que a esposa achou que era crânio de vaca só por ser grande, mas o pai da vítima do engano (o sogro) disse que era algo bem diferente. Logo, não era animal de fazenda.
  4. Nenhum trecho fala em caça a outros animais, em peixe ou em tubarão.

Portanto, a única afirmação compatível com o texto e com o animal identificado é a de que se trata de um animal lento.

Alternativa B.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • Aa preguiça-gigante era herbívora, não predadora; o texto não diz que caçava.
  • Co crânio tinha molares e pelos, era de mamífero terrestre, não de peixe.
  • Da esposa achou que era de vaca pelo tamanho, mas o sogro corrigiu: era algo muito diferente.
  • Enão há menção a tubarão nem a ataques a pessoas; o animal tinha 11 mil anos e era uma preguiça.

Assuntos: interpretação de texto em inglês, vocabulário.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 83 no caderno 1ª fase da UFPR 2023

Fonte: UFPR 2023 · 1ª fase. Prova oficial ↗