Correção FUVEST 2027 · 1ª faseAcompanhe a resolução de cada questão da 1ª fase, ao vivoAcompanhar

PRÁTICA COM QUESTÕES OFICIAIS

Questão 11 (Inglês) do ITA 2017

Inglês · Inglês: Referência pronominal e pronomes

Texto-base das questões 08 a 12 · Inglês

As questões de 8 a 12 referem-se ao texto a seguir:

INSIDE THE BILL GATES-BACKED ACCELERATOR THAT'S TRAINING
THE NEXT GENERATION OF VENTURE CAPITALISTS

Lauren Gensler, FORBES STAFF

In an airy converted furniture store in Seattle’s Pioneer Square neighborhood, five novice impact fund managers from Zimbabwe, Guatemala and the Netherlands are rehearsing the sales pitches they’ll make the next day to 60 mostly institutional investors, representing $10 billion in capital.

The presentations will be a graduation ceremony of sorts. Despite their impressive resumes, the five men have just completed a four-week boot camp covering everything from term sheets, accounting and mezzanine debt structures to dealing with corruption to defining and marketing their brands. They’ll head home with golden contacts (investor cocktail hours were built into the packed schedule) and a commitment for up to $500,000 in seed capital from Capria Accelerator, a first-of-its-kind venture whose initial investors include Microsoft cofounder (and world’s richest man) Bill Gates.

One of those rehearsing is Patrick Makanza, 51, an M.B.A. and veteran of Unilever and Barclays Bank, who quit a cushy job at a top Zimbabwe private equity firm and launched Vakayi Capital. The first fund being formed by Vakayi (which means “to build”) will back for-profit businesses providing essential services in Zimbabwe, which has per capita gross domestic product of about $1,000. That fund will make loans (with an option to convert some to equity) for an average of four years to small and medium-size businesses that want to expand and can’t get adequate bank financing. Among potential investments: an eye clinic that’s building a new operating room so it can double its daily procedures and bring down the cost of cataract surgery; an education microlender; and a builder of low-cost housing.

The next day, in their presentation, Makanza and his Vakayi cofounder tackle head-on the tough issues they might be asked about, including Zimbabwe’s endemic corruption, economic challenges and currency dramas–it squelched hyperinflation in 2009 by switching to foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar. But in the question period Tracy Washington, principal investment officer for the International Finance Corp.’s global private equity funds, lobs a personal query at Makanza, a father of four who is partial to conservative business suits and golf. “With your resume”, she asks, “why get involved with so risky an enterprise, and will you stick to it?” Makanza responds that he worked in venture capital back in the 1990s and came to miss the highs and lows of investing in early-stage entrepreneurs. “I still have at least ten years to do this. … It’s a real roller-coaster lifestyle. But I enjoyed it, and I want to have more of that experience again.”

Impact investing – which aims to produce both financial and social or environmental returns – is in vogue. Big names in finance, from BlackRock to Goldman Sachs to Bank of America Merrill Lynch, have been piling in recently, seeing it as a way to appeal to the socially conscious Millennials now building and inheriting wealth.

But this alternative asset class is still small – $77 billion invested worldwide, according to a new survey from the Global Impact Investing Network. To grow, it needs experienced, hands-on fund managers, and those are in short supply, particularly in areas with the greatest needs, such as sub-Saharan Africa.

Fonte: http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2016/06/15/capria-bill-gates-impact-investing-accelerator/#56afe1ab1dc4.
(Acesso em 07/07/2016).

Marque a opção em que o item sublinhado NÃO exerce a função de agente da oração.

  1. A
    [...] Patrick Makanza, 51, an M.B.A. and veteran of Unilever and Barclays Bank, who quit a cushy job at a top Zimbabwe private equity firm [...] (linhas 10-11)
  2. B
    That fund will make loans [...] for an average of four years to small and medium-size businesses that want to expand [...] (linhas 13-14-15)
  3. C
    [...] Tracy Washington [...] lobs a personal query at Makanza, a father of four who is partial to conservative business suits and golf. (linhas 21-22-23)
  4. D
    Makanza responds that he worked in venture capital back in the 1990s and came to miss the highs and lows of investing in early-stage entrepreneurs. (linhas 24-25)
  5. E
    Impact investing – which aims to produce both financial and social or environmental returns – is in vogue. (linhas 28-29)
Escolha uma alternativa para conferir o gabarito.
Reportar erro na questão
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Resolução comentada

A pergunta pede o item sublinhado que não é o agente (o sujeito que pratica a ação) da oração em que aparece. Nos pronomes relativos, isso se resolve pela função que a palavra tem dentro da oração que ela introduz: se ela faz o verbo acontecer, é sujeito/agente.

Veja cada caso:

  1. (A) who quit a cushy job: "who" substitui Patrick Makanza, que pediu demissão. É sujeito e agente de quit.
  2. (B) businesses that want to expand: "that" retoma businesses, que querem expandir. É sujeito de want.
  3. (C) a father of four who is partial to...: "who" retoma Makanza e é sujeito de is.
  4. (D) Makanza responds that he worked...: aqui "that" não retoma ninguém. É uma conjunção integrante, que introduz a oração subordinada objetiva (o que ele responde). Não é sujeito nem pratica ação alguma; o agente de worked é "he".
  5. (E) which aims to produce...: "which" retoma impact investing, que visa produzir retornos. É sujeito de aims.

Portanto, só em (D) o termo sublinhado não é agente: é conjunção, e não pronome relativo.

Alternativa D.

Pegadinha: Todos os "that" e "who" parecem iguais, mas em D o "that" é conjunção e não pronome relativo; quem não distingue as duas funções erra.

Por que as outras alternativas estão erradas

  • A"who" é pronome relativo e sujeito de "quit"; Makanza é quem pediu demissão.
  • B"that" retoma "businesses" e é sujeito de "want to expand".
  • C"who" retoma Makanza e é sujeito de "is partial to".
  • E"which" retoma "impact investing" e é sujeito de "aims".

Assunto: Referência pronominal e pronomes.

Reportar erro na resolução
O que está errado?
Sem cadastro: não guardamos quem enviou.
Ver como caiu na prova Questão 11 no caderno Inglês do ITA 2017

Fonte: ITA 2017 · Inglês. Prova oficial ↗